Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Error: Incorrect function
Author | Message |
---|---|
Hello everyone, | |
ID: 6596 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
That's the same error I get in the second GPU of my GTX295 dual card. All WUs which grant 3718 points end in "Compute error": <message> Sometimes at the very beginning but normally after a long time of processing. But, as I have said, only when processed by the second GPU, not the first one. Windows Vista Home Premium 32 bits Nvidia Drivers 180.87 Diferent versions of Boinc, 6.5.0, 6.6.3, etc. You can see it here: http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=17157 There are a lot of them... | |
ID: 6597 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Looking at the overall results for this type of WU, the failure rate doesn't seem to be specially higher... | |
ID: 6602 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
My gtx295 has no overclock (nor mine nor from factory as I can see with GPU-Z) and, what it's the strangest issue, it only gets "compute error" with one kind of units and in the same gpu. With any other unit this gpu works fine. | |
ID: 6603 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have just installed the new beta Nvidia drivers 182.05 and it seems it is better than 180.87. With this gtx295 (EVGA) I could not install drivers 181.20 nor 181.22. They simply didn't work. But with this one (182.05)I can now configure more easily than before the gtx295 to work as two independent gpus. I shall try gpugrid again tomorrow. | |
ID: 6605 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Could you be a bit more specific about the "easier to configure"? Do you mean it just works as expected? If so it would be worth to start a new thread for this (with a title which helps 295 users to find it). | |
ID: 6615 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Signed up awhile ago, and just now have the proper h/w, s/w, and i-net connection to actually start contributing. | |
ID: 6617 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Which driver do you use? Judging by the error message it may be too old. | |
ID: 6618 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
ok, d/l'ing 181.22_xp32 now... | |
ID: 6619 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The actual limit is higher, but it gets reduced when you repeatedly return erroneous results. | |
ID: 6625 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
He has now updated the drivers from 180.84 to 181.22, but it seems even worse right now... | |
ID: 6703 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There are 2 strange issues in his task output: his 9600GSO reports 128 shaders instead of 96 and the "feature is not yet implemented [by the driver]" error message. Something must be very strange about his software setup.. or the hardware? Is his 9600GSO based on a G80 chip? | |
ID: 6725 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thrashing through the paperwork, It looks like he has the G92 9600 GSO w/384mb...unless the detection script in the server is screwed-up. But it still shows as having 128 sp's in the canonical result...Hmmmm | |
ID: 6732 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
He shows 384mb memory on the card. All the G94 based 9600GSO cards are either 512mb or 1G, so it is definitely a G92 (though the 8800gs can falsely report as a 9600GSO I think--same card basically and still with 96 shaders). | |
ID: 6739 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Well, this message goes hand in hand with the "feature not yet implemented" as its direct cause. That's why I assumed an old non-CUDA driver.. which 181.22 certainly isn't. | |
ID: 6743 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Error: Incorrect function