Incorect Function

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Incorect Function

Author	Message
popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4587 - Posted: 19 Dec 2008 \| 23:48:49 UTC
	Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) WU #1 WU #2 Ok here is my setup Q6600 @ 3.0 Ghz gtx 260 core 216 superclocked Driver: 180.48 8600GTS 512Mb (no OC)Driver: 178.13 Win XP SP3 Work units so far have been successful on the GTX 260 but on the 8600GTS they are erroring out... Any Hints/Suggestions?
	ID: 4587 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Kokomiko Send message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4589 - Posted: 19 Dec 2008 \| 23:56:57 UTC - in response to Message 4587.
	Any Hints/Suggestions? Why do you use different drivers on one PC for 2 cards? Both should run wih the same driver and I would prefer the 178.24. ____________
	ID: 4589 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Nognlite Send message Joined: 9 Nov 08 Posts: 69 Credit: 25,106,923 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4595 - Posted: 20 Dec 2008 \| 2:14:19 UTC - in response to Message 4587.
	Yeah, I agree with Kokomiko. I am starting to wonder if GPUGrid is starting to issue WU's based on card configuration. BOINCmgr knows that you have a 260 and an 8600, downloads two different WU's to assign to each one of your cards. but when downloaded, just send it to the first available card which may not be the correct recipient for the WU. They are sending WU's of varying size to allow weaker cards the ability to finish a WU in under 4 days. Any other ideas? Pat
	ID: 4595 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4599 - Posted: 20 Dec 2008 \| 6:18:59 UTC
	I updated the drivers to the newest available for the card.. no specific reason actually... Boinc seems to think I have 2 8600GTS's in the start-up messages 12/19/2008 5:28:23 PM\|\|CUDA devices found 12/19/2008 5:28:23 PM\|\|Coprocessor: GeForce 8600 GTS (2) I will wait and see what the current 2 running will come up with... ~Bob
	ID: 4599 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Nognlite Send message Joined: 9 Nov 08 Posts: 69 Credit: 25,106,923 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4617 - Posted: 20 Dec 2008 \| 14:23:13 UTC - in response to Message 4599.
	Hense BOINCmgr has now choosen the weaker of the two cards so that both cards can process the smaller WU's. Still a theory though. Pat
	ID: 4617 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4623 - Posted: 20 Dec 2008 \| 15:51:35 UTC - in response to Message 4617.
	Hense BOINCmgr has now choosen the weaker of the two cards so that both cards can process the smaller WU's. Still a theory though. I don't think it's that smart yet. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 4623 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4629 - Posted: 20 Dec 2008 \| 17:52:34 UTC
	Well the next 3 tasks finished. The 2 that ran on the gtx 260 again finished fine, The one on the 8600gts didn't... Here is what the log says... 12/20/2008 3:16:42 AM\|GPUGRID\|Computation for task Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1 finished 12/20/2008 3:16:43 AM\|GPUGRID\|Starting xN19912-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_1120000_1 12/20/2008 3:16:44 AM\|GPUGRID\|Starting task xN19912-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_1120000_1 using acemd version 655 12/20/2008 3:16:45 AM\|GPUGRID\|Started upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_0 12/20/2008 3:16:45 AM\|GPUGRID\|Started upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_1 12/20/2008 3:17:02 AM\|GPUGRID\|Finished upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_0 12/20/2008 3:17:02 AM\|GPUGRID\|Started upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_2 12/20/2008 3:17:21 AM\|GPUGRID\|Finished upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_1 12/20/2008 3:17:21 AM\|GPUGRID\|Started upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_3 12/20/2008 3:17:25 AM\|GPUGRID\|Finished upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_3 12/20/2008 3:17:33 AM\|GPUGRID\|Finished upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_2 12/20/2008 3:20:47 AM\|GPUGRID\|Computation for task Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0 finished 12/20/2008 3:20:47 AM\|GPUGRID\|Output file Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0_1 for task Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0 absent 12/20/2008 3:20:47 AM\|GPUGRID\|Output file Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0_2 for task Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0 absent 12/20/2008 3:20:47 AM\|GPUGRID\|Output file Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0_3 for task Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0 absent 12/20/2008 3:20:49 AM\|GPUGRID\|Started upload of Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0_0 12/20/2008 3:20:54 AM\|GPUGRID\|Finished upload of Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0_0 task Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1 was on gtx 260 the other on the 8600GTS So basically what I gather from the logs is that it finished fine yet the output was missing, yet it uploaded it anyway?
	ID: 4629 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4894 - Posted: 26 Dec 2008 \| 22:26:56 UTC
	No other suggestions?
	ID: 4894 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4898 - Posted: 26 Dec 2008 \| 23:13:21 UTC
	OK, let's sort this information a bit and see what we find: - all tasks which run only on the GTX 260 are fine - all tasks which run only on the 8600GTS fail - one task started by GTS and finished by GTX is also fine - the tasks fail after a certain time, not immediately -> i.e. your setup works in principle The message "incorrect function" means that something went wrong during calculation, which can be caused e.g. by overclocking or bad cards. The task fails an therefore no output file is written. Something is uploaded, but I think this is basically the error message. The missing output file is not causing the error, it's a symptom. Could it be that your 8600GTS overheats? The coolers on such "low end" cards are often cheap and just barely strong enough. Plus there may be some dust already, heat from the GTX and the card / chip could already be a bit older (and be thus less tolerant). MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 4898 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4917 - Posted: 27 Dec 2008 \| 2:29:33 UTC - in response to Message 4898.
	The temps on the 8600gts range from 75-90 C under full load... (depending on what's running) A little warm yes.. But still below the 105 C limit... No over-clock on the card... (wouldn't even think about it with the temps it has already) Possibly a part of the card overheats while the rest doesn't? Would you recommend a re-application of the cooling/thermal paste?
	ID: 4917 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4930 - Posted: 27 Dec 2008 \| 10:26:56 UTC
	If it's possible I would test the PC with the side panel open. Watch if the temps improve when another WU runs. If that one succeds we can be pretty sure we found the issue. Additionally you could log the temps, e.g. with RivaTuner. There should be a sharp drop in temperature when a WU fails and we can take a look at the temperature just before failure.. maybe it reached 95°C at this point? (just an example) I wouldn't bother reapplying the thermal grease. That should give you 1 or 2 degrees, nothing game-changing. Dust in the cooler / fan is much more dangerous. And I'd rather mount a nice 3rd party cooler, if I had taken off the old one anyway (to reapply the paste). MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 4930 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4951 - Posted: 27 Dec 2008 \| 17:19:25 UTC - in response to Message 4930.
	Those temperatures were with the case open :P (both sides off)My case is really bad for airflow... Unfortunately (Fortunately?) my drivers got all corrupt (thanks to seti's cuda) and during the troubleshooting to find out what the problem was I removed the 8600GTS... Most likely will re-install during the new year...
	ID: 4951 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4997 - Posted: 28 Dec 2008 \| 13:07:04 UTC
	90°C with the case open? That must be one hell of a bad cooler.. or it's set to spin low and stay relatively silent. Do you know how to set fan speeds yourself? MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 4997 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 5132 - Posted: 1 Jan 2009 \| 3:03:59 UTC - in response to Message 4997.
	The fans were left at the stock auto settings... I have yet to find a program that can modify the second gpu...Do you know of any? Unless of course there is a way to set it that I'm not aware of?
	ID: 5132 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

K1atOdessa Send message Joined: 25 Feb 08 Posts: 249 Credit: 387,028,788 RAC: 1,197,795 Level Scientific publications	Message 5133 - Posted: 1 Jan 2009 \| 3:34:50 UTC - in response to Message 5132.
	I have yet to find a program that can modify the second gpu...Do you know of any? I use Rivatuner 2.22 and it will control the fan speeds of multiple gpu's.
	ID: 5133 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

localizer Send message Joined: 17 Apr 08 Posts: 113 Credit: 1,656,514,857 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 5134 - Posted: 1 Jan 2009 \| 6:00:47 UTC - in response to Message 5133.
	I use Rivatuner on my box with multiple GPUs - I think installing nTune will also give you the same capability - although Riva is a much more comprehensive tool. EVGA Precision is fine for boxes with a single GPU. P.
	ID: 5134 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Incorect Function

	About	Science	Volunteers	Performance	Forum	Join us	Donate

Author	Message
popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4587 - Posted: 19 Dec 2008 \| 23:48:49 UTC
	Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) WU #1 WU #2 Ok here is my setup Q6600 @ 3.0 Ghz gtx 260 core 216 superclocked Driver: 180.48 8600GTS 512Mb (no OC)Driver: 178.13 Win XP SP3 Work units so far have been successful on the GTX 260 but on the 8600GTS they are erroring out... Any Hints/Suggestions?
	ID: 4587 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Kokomiko Send message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4589 - Posted: 19 Dec 2008 \| 23:56:57 UTC - in response to Message 4587.
	Any Hints/Suggestions? Why do you use different drivers on one PC for 2 cards? Both should run wih the same driver and I would prefer the 178.24. ____________
	ID: 4589 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Nognlite Send message Joined: 9 Nov 08 Posts: 69 Credit: 25,106,923 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4595 - Posted: 20 Dec 2008 \| 2:14:19 UTC - in response to Message 4587.
	Yeah, I agree with Kokomiko. I am starting to wonder if GPUGrid is starting to issue WU's based on card configuration. BOINCmgr knows that you have a 260 and an 8600, downloads two different WU's to assign to each one of your cards. but when downloaded, just send it to the first available card which may not be the correct recipient for the WU. They are sending WU's of varying size to allow weaker cards the ability to finish a WU in under 4 days. Any other ideas? Pat
	ID: 4595 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4599 - Posted: 20 Dec 2008 \| 6:18:59 UTC
	I updated the drivers to the newest available for the card.. no specific reason actually... Boinc seems to think I have 2 8600GTS's in the start-up messages 12/19/2008 5:28:23 PM\|\|CUDA devices found 12/19/2008 5:28:23 PM\|\|Coprocessor: GeForce 8600 GTS (2) I will wait and see what the current 2 running will come up with... ~Bob
	ID: 4599 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Nognlite Send message Joined: 9 Nov 08 Posts: 69 Credit: 25,106,923 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4617 - Posted: 20 Dec 2008 \| 14:23:13 UTC - in response to Message 4599.
	Hense BOINCmgr has now choosen the weaker of the two cards so that both cards can process the smaller WU's. Still a theory though. Pat
	ID: 4617 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4623 - Posted: 20 Dec 2008 \| 15:51:35 UTC - in response to Message 4617.
	Hense BOINCmgr has now choosen the weaker of the two cards so that both cards can process the smaller WU's. Still a theory though. I don't think it's that smart yet. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 4623 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4629 - Posted: 20 Dec 2008 \| 17:52:34 UTC
	Well the next 3 tasks finished. The 2 that ran on the gtx 260 again finished fine, The one on the 8600gts didn't... Here is what the log says... 12/20/2008 3:16:42 AM\|GPUGRID\|Computation for task Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1 finished 12/20/2008 3:16:43 AM\|GPUGRID\|Starting xN19912-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_1120000_1 12/20/2008 3:16:44 AM\|GPUGRID\|Starting task xN19912-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_1120000_1 using acemd version 655 12/20/2008 3:16:45 AM\|GPUGRID\|Started upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_0 12/20/2008 3:16:45 AM\|GPUGRID\|Started upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_1 12/20/2008 3:17:02 AM\|GPUGRID\|Finished upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_0 12/20/2008 3:17:02 AM\|GPUGRID\|Started upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_2 12/20/2008 3:17:21 AM\|GPUGRID\|Finished upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_1 12/20/2008 3:17:21 AM\|GPUGRID\|Started upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_3 12/20/2008 3:17:25 AM\|GPUGRID\|Finished upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_3 12/20/2008 3:17:33 AM\|GPUGRID\|Finished upload of Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1_2 12/20/2008 3:20:47 AM\|GPUGRID\|Computation for task Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0 finished 12/20/2008 3:20:47 AM\|GPUGRID\|Output file Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0_1 for task Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0 absent 12/20/2008 3:20:47 AM\|GPUGRID\|Output file Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0_2 for task Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0 absent 12/20/2008 3:20:47 AM\|GPUGRID\|Output file Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0_3 for task Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0 absent 12/20/2008 3:20:49 AM\|GPUGRID\|Started upload of Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0_0 12/20/2008 3:20:54 AM\|GPUGRID\|Finished upload of Yd21241-SH2_USPME-2-40-SH2_USPME1910000_0_0 task Ze27319-SH2_US_1-6-40-SH2_US_12150000_1 was on gtx 260 the other on the 8600GTS So basically what I gather from the logs is that it finished fine yet the output was missing, yet it uploaded it anyway?
	ID: 4629 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4894 - Posted: 26 Dec 2008 \| 22:26:56 UTC
	No other suggestions?
	ID: 4894 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4898 - Posted: 26 Dec 2008 \| 23:13:21 UTC
	OK, let's sort this information a bit and see what we find: - all tasks which run only on the GTX 260 are fine - all tasks which run only on the 8600GTS fail - one task started by GTS and finished by GTX is also fine - the tasks fail after a certain time, not immediately -> i.e. your setup works in principle The message "incorrect function" means that something went wrong during calculation, which can be caused e.g. by overclocking or bad cards. The task fails an therefore no output file is written. Something is uploaded, but I think this is basically the error message. The missing output file is not causing the error, it's a symptom. Could it be that your 8600GTS overheats? The coolers on such "low end" cards are often cheap and just barely strong enough. Plus there may be some dust already, heat from the GTX and the card / chip could already be a bit older (and be thus less tolerant). MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 4898 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4917 - Posted: 27 Dec 2008 \| 2:29:33 UTC - in response to Message 4898.
	The temps on the 8600gts range from 75-90 C under full load... (depending on what's running) A little warm yes.. But still below the 105 C limit... No over-clock on the card... (wouldn't even think about it with the temps it has already) Possibly a part of the card overheats while the rest doesn't? Would you recommend a re-application of the cooling/thermal paste?
	ID: 4917 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4930 - Posted: 27 Dec 2008 \| 10:26:56 UTC
	If it's possible I would test the PC with the side panel open. Watch if the temps improve when another WU runs. If that one succeds we can be pretty sure we found the issue. Additionally you could log the temps, e.g. with RivaTuner. There should be a sharp drop in temperature when a WU fails and we can take a look at the temperature just before failure.. maybe it reached 95°C at this point? (just an example) I wouldn't bother reapplying the thermal grease. That should give you 1 or 2 degrees, nothing game-changing. Dust in the cooler / fan is much more dangerous. And I'd rather mount a nice 3rd party cooler, if I had taken off the old one anyway (to reapply the paste). MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 4930 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4951 - Posted: 27 Dec 2008 \| 17:19:25 UTC - in response to Message 4930.
	Those temperatures were with the case open :P (both sides off)My case is really bad for airflow... Unfortunately (Fortunately?) my drivers got all corrupt (thanks to seti's cuda) and during the troubleshooting to find out what the problem was I removed the 8600GTS... Most likely will re-install during the new year...
	ID: 4951 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 4997 - Posted: 28 Dec 2008 \| 13:07:04 UTC
	90°C with the case open? That must be one hell of a bad cooler.. or it's set to spin low and stay relatively silent. Do you know how to set fan speeds yourself? MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 4997 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

popandbob Send message Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 40,277,822 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 5132 - Posted: 1 Jan 2009 \| 3:03:59 UTC - in response to Message 4997.
	The fans were left at the stock auto settings... I have yet to find a program that can modify the second gpu...Do you know of any? Unless of course there is a way to set it that I'm not aware of?
	ID: 5132 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

K1atOdessa Send message Joined: 25 Feb 08 Posts: 249 Credit: 387,028,788 RAC: 1,197,795 Level Scientific publications	Message 5133 - Posted: 1 Jan 2009 \| 3:34:50 UTC - in response to Message 5132.
	I have yet to find a program that can modify the second gpu...Do you know of any? I use Rivatuner 2.22 and it will control the fan speeds of multiple gpu's.
	ID: 5133 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

localizer Send message Joined: 17 Apr 08 Posts: 113 Credit: 1,656,514,857 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 5134 - Posted: 1 Jan 2009 \| 6:00:47 UTC - in response to Message 5133.
	I use Rivatuner on my box with multiple GPUs - I think installing nTune will also give you the same capability - although Riva is a much more comprehensive tool. EVGA Precision is fine for boxes with a single GPU. P.
	ID: 5134 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote