Message boards : Number crunching : ADRIA_FAAH_WT batch
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,206,655,749 RAC: 261,147 Level  Scientific publications   | |
|
This batch consists super-long workunits. | | |Estimated| GPU | GPU
CPU | GPU | OS | runtime |usage|frequ
i7-4930k | GTX TITAN X (Maxwell) | Windows XP | 18h 22m | 81% | 1390
i3-4370 | GTX 980Ti (Maxwell) | Windows XP | 22h 18m | 69% | 1316
i3-4160 | GTX 980Ti (Maxwell) | Windows XP | 19h 55m | 75% | 1366
As the runtimes does not scale, and there's very different GPU usage I think these workunits have different number of atoms in the same batch. We'll see in 18h. | |
ID: 46448 | Rating: 0 | rate:
 /   Reply
Quote
| |
|
PappaLitto  Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 511 Credit: 4,672,242,755 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications    | |
|
Like I said in another thread, very strange usage on my 970 on windows 10, it doesn't seem to be any different on XP. In fact, My 970 has downclocked itself from 1392 stock boost to 1164 with the same GPU load, ~75% | |
| ID: 46451 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Stefan Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 5 Mar 13 Posts: 348 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications  | |
|
The long runtime was a mistake by Adria. We apologize and have stopped the WUs as well. He will resend them with shorter runtimes. | |
| ID: 46456 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,206,655,749 RAC: 261,147 Level Scientific publications | |
|
e1s14_2-ADRIA_FAAH_WT_3-0-1-RND6812_0 | |
| ID: 46457 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,206,655,749 RAC: 261,147 Level Scientific publications | |
The long runtime was a mistake by Adria. We apologize and have stopped the WUs as well. He will resend them with shorter runtimes.Should we abort these WUs? The GPU utilization is not something we can control. Some simulations (like membrane protein simulations) include CPU logic which might be the cause of that, but we cannot change that.That's ok, but you should add some extra credits in this case, as these workunits take longer thus their credit/time ratio is less. | |
| ID: 46458 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
PappaLitto Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 511 Credit: 4,672,242,755 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
If he could split these WUs into fourths or less that would be great. | |
| ID: 46459 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Bikermatt Send message Joined: 8 Apr 10 Posts: 37 Credit: 3,839,902,185 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I picked up one of these on my Win7 I7-6800K host with two GTX 980s. The task is 73% complete at 22 hours. I am only getting 67% GPU utilization but I am running 8 threads of evolution at home on the CPUs. With CPU tasks suspended GPU utilization is 79%. | |
| ID: 46460 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,206,655,749 RAC: 261,147 Level Scientific publications | |
|
e1s13_2-ADRIA_FAAH_WT_1-0-1-RND9231_0 PERFORMANCE: 104124 Natoms 5.736 ns/day The previous task:PERFORMANCE: 104124 Natoms 5.058 ns/day So these tasks are much more dependant on the CPU than the previous similar ones. | |
| ID: 46461 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
PappaLitto Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 511 Credit: 4,672,242,755 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
The WU still seems to use only about ~70% Usage on windows 10 having restarted the computer to fix the low clock freq bug. It only uses 7% of the 4 thread i5 2400 at 3.2ghz using 300MB of RAM. What freq are you running on that 4930k Zoltan? I'm curious just how much the CPU freq matters to these WUs | |
| ID: 46462 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,206,655,749 RAC: 261,147 Level Scientific publications | |
What freq are you running on that 4930k Zoltan? I'm curious just how much the CPU freq matters to these WUs4.4GHz | |
| ID: 46463 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
PappaLitto Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 511 Credit: 4,672,242,755 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I didn't manage to snag one of the new ADRIA_MI_FAAH_WTYPE_ WUs, Are they similar in performance? | |
| ID: 46464 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,206,655,749 RAC: 261,147 Level Scientific publications | |
I didn't manage to snag one of the new ADRIA_MI_FAAH_WTYPE_ WUs, Are they similar in performance?Their performance is similar (74% GPU usage), but they are much shorter (~6 hours on a GTX 980Ti@1366MHz/i3-4160/Windows XP) | |
| ID: 46465 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
PappaLitto Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 511 Credit: 4,672,242,755 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
...but they are much shorter (~6 hours on a GTX 980Ti@1366MHz/i3-4160/Windows XP) Ah, thanks for taking my advice Stefan | |
| ID: 46466 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,206,655,749 RAC: 261,147 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I've noticed that my (Windows XP x64) hosts which had the 368.22 driver (CUDA 8.0) were processing these workunits slower than those which have the 359.06 or 358.50 driver (CUDA 7.5), so now I've downgraded them to 359.06. | |
| ID: 46467 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Message boards : Number crunching : ADRIA_FAAH_WT batch
