Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : BOINC 6.3.17 is out
Author | Message |
---|---|
BOINC 6.3.17 for windows is available. | |
ID: 3246 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Seems to run fine on Vista64. | |
ID: 3247 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
6.3.17 seems ok so far, But I've had little time to observe it. I installed it last night but had other things to do and have only been awake 10 minutes today. | |
ID: 3248 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
This is more for krunchin Keith | |
ID: 3254 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
This is more for krunchin Keith Hum... First I suspect you have an unclosed or invalid tag in cc_config.xml before those, those are all valid tags and I have all those in my file. This might be causing all the problems. As for x64 version it should be the same as x86, but since I do not have there could be some flaw I can't test for. I also do not use an account manager. This question would be better posted on the alpha email list. But if we could check your cc_config first that might be a good starts, Could you PM me your entire cc_config.xml file. | |
ID: 3259 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
first, sorry 4 the bad english. | |
ID: 3261 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
the underlying logic of cpu-s changed from ncpus to max_cpus in 6.3.17 | |
ID: 3264 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
the underlying logic of cpu-s changed from ncpus to max_cpus in 6.3.17 Thats not exactly correct. max_cpus was the old way before 6.X something, where in your preferences you specified # (1,2,4) of processors, to limit less than max usage. At some point it was changed to a percentage max_ncpus_pct where you specify this as a percentage 25%,50%,100% of the processors as reported by the os. What has happened is some people run new clients on old projects only using the old preference way, not being able to set this, so the old way was added back, and combined. The client can use either way or both where it will take the minimum of the two if both are specified, always with a minimum of 1 as you cannot run with 0 cpus. ncpus is the internal designation inside the client and also the debug flag to be used to simulate a higher number of processors for testing, so testers and developers could test the logic of having 4 cpus without actually having a quad-core. See changeset 16281 David 22 Oct 2008 | |
ID: 3271 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
It would be really nice in these threads about BOINC clients if posters would specify whether they are talking about Windows or Linux clients. I am using Linux only and have to do a lot of scrolling around to see which platform is being discussed to see if it applies to my setups....Thanks | |
ID: 3273 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
This is more for krunchin Keith Do you run boinc as a service ? I have no problem, but someone else is now reporting that when running as a service on windows XP (32bit) version that the service is cutting out after 30 seconds. | |
ID: 3277 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
It would be really nice in these threads about BOINC clients if posters would specify whether they are talking about Windows or Linux clients. I am using Linux only and have to do a lot of scrolling around to see which platform is being discussed to see if it applies to my setups....Thanks Well, since there is no linux 6.3.17 client yet....I think we are talking about windows. Most options apply equally to all clients though. First post says ...for windows... Another post says vista64 Another says Server 2008 x64 (That is Windows) | |
ID: 3278 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
cant run this project as a service, so no, its not. | |
ID: 3281 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Others on my team are asking why every thing they start BOINC a window pops up to attach to a project. | |
ID: 3282 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Others on my team are asking why every thing they start BOINC a window pops up to attach to a project. Weird, I only had that with 6.3.8, or maybe it was 6.3.10. 6.3.17 runs fine here with Vista 64 SP1. I haven't seen any problems `til now... What exactly are they doing to get the attach to project wizard pop up? ____________ ![]() pixelicious.at - my little photoblog | |
ID: 3284 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
starting the BOINC manager | |
ID: 3286 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Others on my team are asking why every thing they start BOINC a window pops up to attach to a project. if they are upgrading, most likely the registry was corrupted. My installation is always manual - extract the boinc files by /a switch placed the extracted files in one location. Then the data files in other location. etc..etc You must have some knowledge about MSI inorder to do manual installs. Like understading the Custom Actions, Services, etc... Here's the registry (keyword INSTALLDIR and DATADIR): [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Space Sciences Laboratory, U.C. Berkeley\BOINC Setup] "INSTALLDIR"="D:\\BOINC\\" "LAUNCHPROGRAM"="" "ENABLELAUNCHATLOGON"="" "ENABLESCREENSAVER"="" "SERVICE_DOMAIN"="" "SERVICE_USERNAME"="" "SETUPSTATESTORED"="TRUE" "MIGRATIONVERSION"="" "MIGRATION"="TRUE" "MIGRATIONDIR"="D:\\BOINC\\" "RETURN_REBOOTREQUESTED"="0" "REBOOTPROMPT"="" "RETURN_VALIDATEINSTALL"="1" "DATADIR"="D:\\BOINC Data\\" "ENABLEPROTECTEDAPPLICATIONEXECUTION"="" "ENABLEUSEBYALLUSERS"="1" | |
ID: 3288 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Others on my team are asking why every thing they start BOINC a window pops up to attach to a project. Yes, I had that with the 6.3.10, too, every time I restarted Windows and BOINC the Attach-Window did come up. I first thought it could be a missed setting during the installation, but it wasn't. After changing to the 6.3.17 all is fine now. ____________ Member of BOINC@Heidelberg and ATA! ![]() | |
ID: 3289 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Others on my team are asking why every thing they start BOINC a window pops up to attach to a project. Same here. I had 6.3.10 on this machine that I use to check the rest of my grove. Every time I selected a new machine, it would pop up a window reminding me to use BAM to select a project for most of my machines. Some would not do that weirdness, I guess since they were to old. Anyway, 6.3.17 doesn't do this any more. | |
ID: 3291 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I had 6.3.17 ask to attach to BAM! every time it restarted... got old real quick. Id see the windows "communicating with BAM!" then it would ask for my account info. I finally resubmitted the account info (even though in the message logs I would see it had already connected)and the message never came back. | |
ID: 3294 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
cant run this project as a service, so no, its not. I thought that applied only to Windows Vista. I had 6.3.17 ask to attach to BAM! every time it restarted... got old real quick. Id see the windows "communicating with BAM!" then it would ask for my account info. I finally resubmitted the account info (even though in the message logs I would see it had already connected)and the message never came back. So is 6.3.17 still crashing or is it running now ? | |
ID: 3297 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Others on my team are asking why every thing they start BOINC a window pops up to attach to a project. Same for me, I only had that in 6.3.10. When up grading to 6.3.14, 6.3.15, 6.3.16 and 6.3.17 I never saw it again on 3 windows computers. When I did have it all I did was hit cancel and the window would go away and client would then load all existing projects and go on like it never asked that. | |
ID: 3298 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
One of my rig with v6.3.17 doesnt have any work.. | |
ID: 3332 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
One of my rig with v6.3.17 doesnt have any work.. Yes, GPU should always run tasks, but tasks are fetched by a separate process, work fetch. The scheduler can't run tasks if work fetch does not get any for it to run. I'm not sure exactly how resource shares play a role in that. As for the internal error, I saw that too today, for the first time in any client. it came after I had tried to test the graphics button, not sure if that was the cause, but after a restart of the client I have not seen it again, have not tried graphics since then either. | |
ID: 3338 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Suddenly too I am seeing bad behavior in 6.3.17 which was not in the 6.3.15 client, I think a new bug has crept in. A moment ago I brought up manager to find the first PS3GRID CPU<1 running (has been for 5 hours), all looked fine, had two other cpu tasks running too (my max). Now one of those two CPU has quit without me touching anything, another did not start, which is not correct. Also too the CPU<1 is running at low priority and in earlier tests all CPU<1 ran at normal priority. If I now suspend PS3GRID CUDA tasks, my CUDA tasks from test project won't start which didn't happen before. Suddenly I got lots of internal errors logged. something is out of whack in this client. After a restart the CUDA runs at normal priority. I see some debugging needs to be done, but that will have to wait until tomorrow. I've been up for 16 hours already today. I'll also have to inquire about tweeks made in 6.3.17 over 6.3.15 to see if we can narrow this down. | |
ID: 3339 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Hi Keith, | |
ID: 3345 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Suddenly too I am seeing bad behavior in 6.3.17 which was not in the 6.3.15 client, I think a new bug has crept in. A moment ago I brought up manager to find the first PS3GRID CPU<1 running (has been for 5 hours), all looked fine, had two other cpu tasks running too (my max). Now one of those two CPU has quit without me touching anything, another did not start, which is not correct. Similar problem with the 6.3.17 (reported in the <1 CPU thread). Went back to 6.3.14, 3 CPU tasks + 2 GPU tasks running for 10 minutes so far (1 CPU went to "Waiting to run" within seconds on 6.3.17). I'll watch this for a while in 6.3.14 to see if it ever goes back again for me (to rule out <1 CPU issue versus 6.3.17 issue). http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=453&nowrap=true#3342 | |
ID: 3347 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Something strange is going on. Made the switch from 6.3.10 to 6.3.17 yesterday and it's running 4 CPU + 1 GPU task, as expected. But my log is spammed with entries like this:
It's not doing this all the time, but really a lot. I have no idea what this means. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 3356 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Stefan@home wrote: From the logs it looked like it has to do with the preemption of tasks, but I'm not a dev, I only report what I see... ;) Yes, but BOINC didn't stop the tasks. Or if it did it's not reporting it. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 3361 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Actually I was talking about my logs in the other thread. I'm sorry that I haven't stated that... ;) Here's what I saw when BOINC switched from 4CPU plus 1 GPU to 3 CPU plus 1 GPU tasks: 26.10.2008 08:55:09||[cpu_sched_debug] CPU efficiency old 0.805795 new 0.805822 wall 40.809601 CPU 35.211000 w 0.999528 e 0.862812 26.10.2008 08:55:09|PS3GRID|Master file download succeeded 26.10.2008 08:55:10|Docking@Home|Finished download of 1m0b_mod0013sc_69336_87792.inp 26.10.2008 08:55:10||[cpu_sched_debug] CPU efficiency old 0.805822 new 0.805823 wall 4.367996 CPU 3.628000 w 0.999949 e 0.830587 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] Request CPU reschedule: files downloaded 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] schedule_cpus(): start 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] CPU efficiency old 0.805823 new 0.805826 wall 4.243202 CPU 3.650000 w 0.999951 e 0.860199 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] highest debt: 86400.000000 fH25969-GPUTEST4-9-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] already reserved coprocessors for fH25969-GPUTEST4-9-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] scheduling fH25969-GPUTEST4-9-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] highest debt: 84685.714286 Ms17952-GPUTEST4-7-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] rr_sim: insufficient coproc CUDA (1 + 1 > 1) 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] insufficient coprocessors for Ms17952-GPUTEST4-7-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] highest debt: 84685.714286 md16645-GPUTEST4-2-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] rr_sim: insufficient coproc CUDA (1 + 1 > 1) 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] insufficient coprocessors for md16645-GPUTEST4-2-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] highest debt: 84685.714286 Rzx1100-GPUTEST4-8-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] rr_sim: insufficient coproc CUDA (1 + 1 > 1) 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] insufficient coprocessors for Rzx1100-GPUTEST4-8-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] highest debt: 30.228069 1m0b_mod0013sc_70074_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] scheduling 1m0b_mod0013sc_70074_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] highest debt: -312.629074 1m0b_mod0013sc_70553_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] scheduling 1m0b_mod0013sc_70553_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] highest debt: -655.486217 1m0b_mod0013sc_67283_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] scheduling 1m0b_mod0013sc_67283_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] highest debt: -998.343360 1m0b_mod0013sc_69336_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] scheduling 1m0b_mod0013sc_69336_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] Request enforce CPU schedule: schedule_cpus 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] enforce_schedule(): start 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] want to run: fH25969-GPUTEST4-9-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] want to run: 1m0b_mod0013sc_70074_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] want to run: 1m0b_mod0013sc_70553_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] want to run: 1m0b_mod0013sc_67283_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] want to run: 1m0b_mod0013sc_69336_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] processing fH25969-GPUTEST4-9-10-acemd_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] processing 1m0b_mod0013sc_70074_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] didn't preempt wu_102208_154906_2_2_0: tr 4962.414900 tsc 649.491398 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] processing 1m0b_mod0013sc_70553_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] didn't preempt wu_102208_154906_2_2_0: tr 4962.414900 tsc 649.491398 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] processing 1m0b_mod0013sc_67283_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] didn't preempt wu_102208_154906_2_2_0: tr 4962.414900 tsc 649.491398 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] processing 1m0b_mod0013sc_69336_87792_0 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Docking@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] didn't preempt wu_102208_154906_2_2_0: tr 4962.414900 tsc 649.491398 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] finished preempt loop, ncpus_used 3.900000 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] using 3.900000 out of 4 CPUs 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Einstein@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] h1_0600.55_S5R4__224_S5R4a_1 sched state 2 next 2 task state 1 26.10.2008 08:55:11|PS3GRID|[cpu_sched_debug] fH25969-GPUTEST4-9-10-acemd_0 sched state 2 next 2 task state 1 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Cosmology@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] wu_102208_154906_2_2_0 sched state 2 next 2 task state 1 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Einstein@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] h1_0600.55_S5R4__222_S5R4a_1 sched state 2 next 2 task state 1 26.10.2008 08:55:11|Cosmology@Home|[cpu_sched_debug] wu_102208_154924_0_1_0 sched state 1 next 1 task state 9 26.10.2008 08:55:11||[cpu_sched_debug] enforce_schedule: end ____________ ![]() pixelicious.at - my little photoblog | |
ID: 3362 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Suddenly too I am seeing bad behavior in 6.3.17 which was not in the 6.3.15 client, I think a new bug has crept in. A moment ago I brought up manager to find the first PS3GRID CPU<1 running (has been for 5 hours), all looked fine, had two other cpu tasks running too (my max). Now one of those two CPU has quit without me touching anything, another did not start, which is not correct. I know 6.3.14 has problems, it will not work correctly, sooner or later. You can run 6.3.14 if you want to, but it is not perfect. 6.3.15 was next to perfect, when I tested it, as far as scheduling, it has some screen redraw flaws. There is a Windows only version. At this time I recommend users to use 6.3.10 for linux and 6.3.10 or 6.3.15 for Windows. If you have not upgraded to 6.3.17, do not. Some new bug has been introduced into 6.3.17 when running CPU<1. It is not harmful, only leaves you with wrong amount of tasks runing and shows some kind of internal error. once this happens you can only quit and restart, but it will then happen again. | |
ID: 3364 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I'll try 6.3.15. *UPDATE* 6.3.15 went back to 4 tasks (2 CPU, 2 GPU) shortly after install. I will try 6.3.10, before again trying 6.3.14 again (which ran fine with 3 CPU and 2 GPU tasks for 12+ hours). | |
ID: 3366 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I was going to do some testing today, but I'm so burned out, I gave up early this morning. | |
ID: 3393 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Hi, | |
ID: 3414 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
disable SLI to be able to use both video cards to crunch. | |
ID: 3424 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
However, this doesn't solve the "starving for CPU time" issue. | |
ID: 3427 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
ok thx | |
ID: 3430 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Seems that умкертп is more or less OK, excluding CPU consumpting of 6.48 GPU application (on Windows). | |
ID: 3433 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Heads-up for anyone who's Windows 6.3.17 or Linux 6.3.18 client is crashing (upon requesting work from any project): check whether cc_config's sched_op_debug is on. | |
ID: 3434 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
thx. Will setting it to 0 worf for the time being? or should I just remove the line? | |
ID: 3442 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Will setting it to 0 worf for the time being? Yes, it should. Just the non-zero value is important for triggering the crash. or should I just remove the line? If you do not intend to type it in later... (Now I do not know anymore, why I've not changed it to 0, but renamed to sched____op_debug - possibly to notice it at a later time? Weird idea :-) Peter | |
ID: 3444 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : BOINC 6.3.17 is out