Message boards : Number crunching : 0.973 CPUs + 1 GPU
Author | Message |
---|---|
Do I have any drawbacks running 1 GPUGrid WU and 4 CPU tasks (intel i5) at the same time? | |
ID: 41311 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes, the GPUGrid task will run a bit slower on your GTX970. | |
ID: 41312 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Wouldnt setting the the core usage to 75% result in the same? Only that 1 GPU and 3 CPU tasks run + 1 idle core? | |
ID: 41314 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes, it's sufficient to set CPU usage to 75% in Boinc Manager. | |
ID: 41315 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ok. Thanks very much. | |
ID: 41316 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I just tried out a new GTX 970 to answer that very question, and saw only a minor difference, though it will depend on your CPU, etc. In my case, I have an i5-3550, which has four real cores running CPDN work units, and I did not initially reserve a core for the GPU. | |
ID: 41317 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
That is a bit faster, albeit only ~2.5%. This is because the latest apps are quite good at utilizing the GPU without much CPU reliance and you have 4 real cores with 4 true threads. On CPU's with HT the difference tends to be higher. | |
ID: 41319 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Undoubtedly correct, but my main takeaway is that the GTX 970, though very good, is not quite as great as the GTX 750 Ti for efficiency. But I am spoiled by the latter, so I think I will add a couple more of them to GPUGrid, and use the GTX 970 for Folding, where its extra speed is rewarded by the quick-return bonus. It all follows along pretty well to the performance results you gave earlier (https://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=1150&nowrap=true#41294), so it is not really a surprise. | |
ID: 41323 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
... and use the GTX 970 for Folding, where its extra speed is rewarded by the quick-return bonus. There is a quick return bonus in GPUGrid also, it's 50% for less than 24h, and 25% for less than 48h. Your GTX750Ti finish the longest Gerards just under 24h, so if the workunits gets any longer (I'm sure they will as GPUs gets faster) your GTX750Ti's might miss the 50% bonus. I don't recommend to buy two or more lesser cards instead of one bigger if they are from the same generation. | |
ID: 41324 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I am well aware of the 24 hour bonus, and the GTX 750 Tis can do it. The work units might get longer, but also GPUGrid might come up with improved software. And the new Noelia ETQunboundx show that they might go down again too. Moving cards around is just part of the process, and the GTX 750 Tis are the most efficient for any project I have used them on, so they will find a home somewhere. | |
ID: 41325 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I didnt want to open a new thread. Another question. | |
ID: 41418 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you don't want work to be cached, then set your cache settings to not get it! | |
ID: 41432 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Also. Has someone figured out what the best clocks for a 970 are when underclocking to get best performance per Watt? Performance/Watt needs to be taken at the system level (not the GPU level), and measured at the wall. Your i5-2500K (95W TDP) and supporting hardwares power usage would be as much of a concern as the 970's clocks. You really need to tune the system, not just the GPU (though that in itself helps a bit). The simplest way to control performance on the Maxwell's is just to throttle the power. You could set it to 90%, 80% or less. The issue then would be it's p-state might drop from p2 to p5 - assuming you don't want to run a 970 at 405MHz! Can be controlled using NVidia Inspector (overclocking), but it's quite confusing when you first start to use it. My i7-3770K @3.7GHz and 2 GTX970's (W7): 4 GPUGrid tasks running on 2 GTX970's + 2 climate models uses 423W (SWAN_SYNC in use). Estimated throughput gain is >15% from running 2tasks/GPU. Note that in this setup GPUGrid is using 4 CPU threads to support 4 GPU tasks. Without the 2 climate models running the power drops to 415 (only 8W less, which is typical given that the CPU is already being well used). If I then suspend one GPUGrid task the system power at the wall drops to 409W (another 6W less) and with only 1 task running per GPU it drops to 390W (19W less). My GPU's power is capped at 100% so they are using 145W each (290W) and the rest of the system is therefore using 100W (but it is an i7). In the same configuration, the 390W power usage drops to 370 when I reduce the CPU's clock from 3.7GHz to 3.1GHz - indicating a system (excluding GPU's) power usage of 80W. With 4 GPUGrid tasks and 2 climate models running and the CPU at 3.1GHz the system power draw is 397W (18W less simply due to reducing the CPU clocks). If I tweaked the CPU voltage that might be reduced further, and I could drop the CPU clocks more. While that would probably not be productive in terms of system performance/Watt it might allow the system to run cooler and more quietly (if that was the desire). If you go through the above procedure (adapted to your system and configuration) and run a task with different test setups you can work out what configuration brings the best Performance/Watt based on the runtimes. ____________ FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help | |
ID: 41436 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Number crunching : 0.973 CPUs + 1 GPU