I now have about 15 WU that spontaneously abort at 1 Hr.

like ...

Name e10s3_e1s67f460-GERARD_CXCL12_LIG11_CGENFF2-1-2-RND2153_0
Workunit 10707801
Created 1 Mar 2015 | 1:31:51 UTC
Sent 1 Mar 2015 | 8:34:50 UTC
Received 1 Mar 2015 | 9:34:55 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Abandoned
Client state New
Exit status 0 (0x0)
Computer ID 191787
Report deadline 6 Mar 2015 | 8:34:50 UTC
Run time 0.00
CPU time 0.00
Validate state Initial
Credit 0.00
Application version Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.47 (cuda65)

They are running on an nvidia gpx 770

Any Ideas?? This is using Win-7

What info do "you" need to help diagnose this?

Ed F

(I don't see an "edit" option)

The most recent WU is now at 1:45 ... must have been a bad batch??

Ed F

Edit

nope ... this one died at 2:00

Ed F

They all say for a status "Abandoned". That's so weird!

I see that your computer's details show:
BOINC version 6.12.34
....

That is ANCIENT.

Please try the latest release, BOINC v7.4.36.
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download.php

They all say for a status "Abandoned". That's so weird!

I see that your computer's details show:
BOINC version 6.12.34
....

That is ANCIENT.

Please try the latest release, BOINC v7.4.36.
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download.php

No, 'Abandoned' is a server-only phenomenon - the tasks are marked thus in the server database record, but as the OP stated in the first post, the BOINC client locally knows nothing about this, and carries on processing - there are no permission problems locally.

In general, when this happens, local tasks continue running until the user notices or all tasks are completed. I'm wondering (and this is pure speculation) whether the 'spontaneous abort' is actually the regular once-per-hour scheduler request 'requested by project', which is specific to this project. If the scheduler reply says the work is no longer viable, that could trigger the abort. That could be checked in the Event Log.

As to why the server is marking the tasks as abandoned - nobody really knows, and I'd appreciate more help in tracking it down. It's done by the function mark_results_over(), which is called in two places in sched/handle_request.cpp (and nowhere else). It's supposed to happen "when there's evidence that the host has detached.", or "If the [RPC] seqno from the host is less than what we expect, the user must have copied the state file to a different host". But it seems to happen more than that, and the finger of suspicion seems to point at communication problems between host and server resulting in RPC requests being processed out of order on the server.

As to running BOINC v6.12.34, that's fine. I run it here too, because it's the last version allowed to run GPUs in Service Mode under Windows XP. Works fine.

Well ... I have no idea ... but I removed the project and reconnected ...

I have completed 1 WU and am 1:45 into the next ... However WU 10709889 is nowhere to be seen ... must have fallen through the cracks during the disconnect??

Anyway ... all SEEMS to be well now ... I have no idea what went wrong ... but ... Thanks for the response!

Ed F

As to why the server is marking the tasks as abandoned - nobody really knows, and I'd appreciate more help in tracking it down. It's done by the function mark_results_over(), which is called in two places in sched/handle_request.cpp (and nowhere else). It's supposed to happen "when there's evidence that the host has detached.", or "If the [RPC] seqno from the host is less than what we expect, the user must have copied the state file to a different host". But it seems to happen more than that, and the finger of suspicion seems to point at communication problems between host and server resulting in RPC requests being processed out of order on the server.