Advanced search

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : New workunits GPUTEST3 and new apps

Author Message
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1830 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 | 9:12:22 UTC

I have uploaded new work GPUTEST3 and new applications for Linux and Windows. Among other little things these are fixing a mistake I made in flops counting (sorry) which affects credits. So we were undercrediting because our estimate of the Gflops of the application was not accurate. Writing the publication presenting the application, we have noticed it.

gdf

Profile [XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 08
Posts: 60
Credit: 108,384
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 1833 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 | 9:45:45 UTC

It's a good news :)

Thanks

TomaszPawel
Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 08
Posts: 121
Credit: 59,836,411
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1884 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 | 7:09:31 UTC - in response to Message 1830.
Last modified: 29 Aug 2008 | 7:09:48 UTC

I have uploaded new work GPUTEST3 and new applications for Linux and Windows. Among other little things these are fixing a mistake I made in flops counting (sorry) which affects credits. So we were undercrediting because our estimate of the Gflops of the application was not accurate. Writing the publication presenting the application, we have noticed it.

gdf


You mean 6.43? Soon my Comp will start crunch them. What changes in application?

Profile koschi
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 14 Aug 08
Posts: 124
Credit: 792,979,198
RAC: 11,592
Level
Glu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1886 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 | 7:41:47 UTC - in response to Message 1884.

I have uploaded new work GPUTEST3 and new applications for Linux and Windows. Among other little things these are fixing a mistake I made in flops counting (sorry) which affects credits. So we were undercrediting because our estimate of the Gflops of the application was not accurate. Writing the publication presenting the application, we have noticed it.

gdf


You mean 6.43? Soon my Comp will start crunch them. What changes in application?


One WU will receive 3,232.06 Credits on successful validation :-D

TomaszPawel
Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 08
Posts: 121
Credit: 59,836,411
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1887 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 | 8:50:11 UTC - in response to Message 1886.


One WU will receive 3,232.06 Credits on successful validation :-D

Woow that is just... cool :) Maby thanx to new app :)

p3d-cluster
Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 08
Posts: 2
Credit: 13,004,227
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwat
Message 1891 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 | 10:02:08 UTC
Last modified: 29 Aug 2008 | 10:04:39 UTC

Only errors on my system :(

Win XP SP2 32Bit
Boinc 6.3.10
Nvidia 177.92 Beta

http://www.ps3grid.net/results.php?hostid=7713

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1892 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 | 10:11:07 UTC - in response to Message 1891.

Only errors on my system :(

Win XP SP2 32Bit
Boinc 6.3.10
Nvidia 177.92 Beta

http://www.ps3grid.net/results.php?hostid=7713


Uhmm,
it should work on your system.
Have you tried with normal non-beta drivers like 177.8x?

Your shader frequency is slightly overclocked, it should be 1512000. Could you turn it down using Nvidia utilities.
Let us know.
gdf

Profile Krunchin-Keith [USA]
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 May 07
Posts: 512
Credit: 111,288,061
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1961 - Posted: 30 Aug 2008 | 18:45:50 UTC

I'm now getting 6.43 on my hosts, all seem to be running well. One host had a problem with the first one but since has been ok. The others seem to be doing ok, but I've only got 1 or 2 completed with each, still with 177.84 driver. I do not have enough completed results yet, but it appears that 6.43, at least for my 3 hosts, is about 2,000s faster than 6.41. I need to let it run some more for a few days, but then I think I can try to see if 177.92 driver works. I've got a lot going on this Holiday weekend anyway.

Profile Kokomiko
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Jul 08
Posts: 190
Credit: 24,093,690
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1962 - Posted: 30 Aug 2008 | 18:49:27 UTC

The 6.43 is here running on 3 PCs, 2 are working with a 8800GT, one with a GTX280. All are running fine. I use on all 3 PCs driver 177.84.
____________

Wolfram1
Send message
Joined: 24 Aug 08
Posts: 45
Credit: 3,431,862
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1964 - Posted: 30 Aug 2008 | 19:10:22 UTC - in response to Message 1961.

One host I do not have enough completed results yet, but it appears that 6.43, at least for my 3 hosts, is about 2,000s faster than 6.41. I need to let it run some more for a few days, but then I think I can try to see if 177.92 driver works. I've got a lot going on this Holiday weekend anyway.


The 6.43 is not faster - the formel for the credits in 6.41 was wrong. Therefor the difference.
I think the 177.92 is faster than the 177.84. The nvidia guys said it in the beta forum.

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1966 - Posted: 30 Aug 2008 | 19:50:01 UTC

6.43 running fine and no difference in run times. I updated to 177.92 beta today and projected run time (after 2 hours) was about the same.

MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

Profile DoctorNow
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 07
Posts: 83
Credit: 122,995,082
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1974 - Posted: 1 Sep 2008 | 13:25:37 UTC
Last modified: 1 Sep 2008 | 13:27:20 UTC

I'm happy to announce my first finished WU on the project and this batch. :)
Was about time to get rid of that Zeros...

I crunched it with a Gigabyte nVidia 9600 GT card on Windows 32-Bit.

Edit:
Sorry for double-post. Messed up with the buttons...

kuarl
Send message
Joined: 5 Mar 08
Posts: 5
Credit: 16,971,567
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1979 - Posted: 1 Sep 2008 | 14:08:10 UTC

the support for 1.0 cuda graphics card is still not present?

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1982 - Posted: 1 Sep 2008 | 14:39:44 UTC - in response to Message 1979.

the support for 1.0 cuda graphics card is still not present?


I am looking into it, but I cannot guarantee anything.

gdf

TomaszPawel
Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 08
Posts: 121
Credit: 59,836,411
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2017 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 | 12:53:08 UTC - in response to Message 1982.
Last modified: 2 Sep 2008 | 12:54:29 UTC

Is 6.43 aplication 32 or 64 bit? or are 2 diferent versions?

BOINC manager is in 32 and in 64. So when it run on x64 Systems aplication 6.43 it runs it in 32 or in 64 bits mode?

Profile MJH
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 696
Credit: 27,266,655
RAC: 0
Level
Val
Scientific publications
watwat
Message 2018 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 | 13:08:09 UTC - in response to Message 2017.

Is 6.43 aplication 32 or 64 bit? or are 2 diferent versions?


The Linux application is 64bit, the Windows version is 32bit.

MJH.

TomaszPawel
Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 08
Posts: 121
Credit: 59,836,411
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2019 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 | 13:09:46 UTC - in response to Message 2018.

Is 6.43 aplication 32 or 64 bit? or are 2 diferent versions?


The Linux application is 64bit, the Windows version is 32bit.

MJH.


Is in linux 64 much faster than 32? When will be 64 bit wersion for windows?

Profile koschi
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 14 Aug 08
Posts: 124
Credit: 792,979,198
RAC: 11,592
Level
Glu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2021 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 | 14:01:21 UTC

I assume that it doesn't make any difference, if it is 64 or 32 bit, as the workload is processed by the GPU anyway. So the app does not profit from 64bit architectures improvements like more registers and stuff like that.
Please correct me if I'm wrong :)

rbpeake
Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 08
Posts: 17
Credit: 80,343,188
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 2022 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 | 14:24:20 UTC - in response to Message 2021.

I assume that it doesn't make any difference, if it is 64 or 32 bit, as the workload is processed by the GPU anyway. So the app does not profit from 64bit architectures improvements like more registers and stuff like that.
Please correct me if I'm wrong :)

I believe that is correct. Plus unless a CPU application is specifically optimized for 64-bit, there really is no advantage to 64-bit.

TomaszPawel
Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 08
Posts: 121
Credit: 59,836,411
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2027 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 | 17:40:54 UTC - in response to Message 1830.
Last modified: 2 Sep 2008 | 17:41:50 UTC

I find interesting error:

http://www.ps3grid.net/result.php?resultid=49857

How it happends?

I have delayed on one hour computing using Boinc Manager.

I uninstall 177.84

Restart

I install 177.92

Restart

And Boinc Manager to my suprise cancel 4 WU and download new. One of those cancel WU was after 13000/50000seconds of crunching....

Now It starts as usual new WU

2008-09-02 18:58:22||CUDA devices found
2008-09-02 18:58:22||Coprocessor: GeForce 8800 GTS 512 (1)
2008-09-02 18:58:43|PS3GRID|Starting Ka12712-GPUTEST3-0-10-acemd_0
2008-09-02 18:58:45|PS3GRID|Starting task Ka12712-GPUTEST3-0-10-acemd_0 using acemd version 643


on new 177.92 beta.
I am very Curious if new drivers will be faster on WinXPS2 32bit than previous 177.84.

rbpeake
Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 08
Posts: 17
Credit: 80,343,188
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 2028 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 | 17:51:14 UTC - in response to Message 2027.

on new 177.92 beta.
I am very Curious if new drivers will be faster on WinXPS2 32bit than previous 177.84.

Be sure to let us know if you find 177.92 is faster or the same speed as 177.84.

Btw, I am still using 177.45 drivers and they seem to work fine.

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2032 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 | 18:36:27 UTC - in response to Message 2027.

I have delayed on one hour computing using Boinc Manager.

I uninstall 177.84

Restart


I'm not sure what you mean by "delayed on one hour". But I have a suggestion what went wrong for you:

When I played around with different drivers I switched BOINC to "no network activity" and made a full backup of the BOINC directory. When I uninstalled a driver (because I wanted to downgrade) and windows rebootet, it didn't have a driver ready. BOINC was installed as a service and apparently started GPU-Grid and errored out because it didn't find a CUDA device. After the driver install I rebootet and restored the backup.

I am very Curious if new drivers will be faster on WinXPS2 32bit than previous 177.84.


No it isn't.

MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

TomaszPawel
Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 08
Posts: 121
Credit: 59,836,411
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2033 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 | 18:55:05 UTC - in response to Message 2032.

I have delayed on one hour computing using Boinc Manager.

I uninstall 177.84

Restart


I'm not sure what you mean by "delayed on one hour". But I have a suggestion what went wrong for you:

When I played around with different drivers I switched BOINC to "no network activity" and made a full backup of the BOINC directory. When I uninstalled a driver (because I wanted to downgrade) and windows rebootet, it didn't have a driver ready. BOINC was installed as a service and apparently started GPU-Grid and errored out because it didn't find a CUDA device. After the driver install I rebootet and restored the backup.

I am very Curious if new drivers will be faster on WinXPS2 32bit than previous 177.84.


No it isn't.

MrS


Yes! Yes! Yes! Fuc..... 177.92 - my system was so slow that I am already back to 177.84. GUI was nightmare....

You have rigt with diagnosis - after reinstaling Boinc don't found CUDA and reset all WU, so i am in 24h wacation from crunching... PS3Grid :(

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2040 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 | 20:15:30 UTC

I didn't notice a GUI difference.

MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : New workunits GPUTEST3 and new apps

//