Advanced search

Message boards : News : New workunits AGGMI1 on protein aggregation

Post to thread Subscribe Sort
Author Message
Toni
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 9 Dec 08
Posts: 1006
Credit: 5,068,599
RAC: 0
Level
Ser
Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 22286 - Posted: 17 Oct 2011 | 16:19:56 UTC
Last modified: 17 Oct 2011 | 16:20:14 UTC

I'm sending a number of these to further a study (almost complete) on the formation of pathological protein aggregates. I placed the WUs into the "short" queue - a GTX 275 (on Linux) should take around 8.5 hours for one.

ID: 22286 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Saenger
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jul 08
Posts: 134
Credit: 23,657,183
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwat
Message 22356 - Posted: 24 Oct 2011 | 14:22:52 UTC - in response to Message 22286.

I'm sending a number of these to further a study (almost complete) on the formation of pathological protein aggregates. I placed the WUs into the "short" queue - a GTX 275 (on Linux) should take around 8.5 hours for one.

On a GT240 they take over 50h, nothing even remotely short.
OK, my card is not the fastest, I usually don't even make the 24h deadline with normal, i.e. really short, WUs I get, but with those long running buggers there's no chance.
Why didn't you put them in the imho proper "long run" slot?
How can I avoid those WUs?
____________
Gruesse vom Saenger

For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki

ID: 22356 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dskagcommunity
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 11
Posts: 456
Credit: 817,865,789
RAC: 0
Level
Glu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 22357 - Posted: 24 Oct 2011 | 15:17:10 UTC
Last modified: 24 Oct 2011 | 15:18:57 UTC

I think thats because they calculate with a GTX265 as slowest official supported Card. TONI Short WUs need 23h on my 9800GTX. Thats in bonustime ok, KASHIV needed 30h too. But our cards are "too slow" for this project and with a GTX265 or higher it runs definitly in the "short" times. I think anything in full bonustime (under 24h) with 265 or higher is short in there definition. Its ok, we only need faster cards :) Hope i can get anything like 570, 460 or 280 too in one month hopefully.
____________
DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at



ID: 22357 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 22358 - Posted: 24 Oct 2011 | 15:20:05 UTC - in response to Message 22357.
Last modified: 24 Oct 2011 | 15:42:10 UTC

You mean GTX260 or GTX275; and both are faster than a GTX460, here.
Long tasks take around 8 to 12h on a GTX580, so 8.5h on a GTX275 fits in with the 'short'/normal task length grouping. 10h has been a fairly typical task length on my GTX260 for a long time.

ID: 22358 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Post to thread

Message boards : News : New workunits AGGMI1 on protein aggregation

//