New beta 6.22 for Windows (Fermi too)

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : New beta 6.22 for Windows (Fermi too)

Author	Message
GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16079 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 \| 9:23:34 UTC
	We have tested locally and this version works for us. Still 30% faster over current application on G200 cards. gdf PS: if all works Fermi application coming out in the afternoon.
	ID: 16079 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

MarkJ Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16082 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 \| 10:37:40 UTC - in response to Message 16079. Last modified: 30 Mar 2010 \| 10:45:49 UTC
	We have tested locally and this version works for us. Still 30% faster over current application on G200 cards. gdf PS: if all works Fermi application coming out in the afternoon. Picked up 3 tonight. 2 out of 3 crashed after about 15 seconds. Third is still going. SWAN : FATAL : Failure executing kernel [mshake_position_kernel_1] [2] [10,1,1][64,1,1] Assertion failed: 0, file swanlib_nv.cpp, line 281 1st wu 2nd wu Both gave a windows pop-up saying task has stopped responding. BOINC 6.10.43, Win7 x64, Driver 196.21 ____________ BOINC blog
	ID: 16082 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

nenym Send message Joined: 31 Mar 09 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,308,230,581 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16086 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 \| 16:22:07 UTC
	Tried to crunch two tasks: 1. Host ID: 31329 - WinXP x64 GTX260 65nm, driver 19713, one of unusable GTX260 cards for GPUGRID. Underclocked according to basic settings by wiki - the card is factory OCed. The task erroed out after 2,972s. Very low CPU load (max. 8% of one core used). <core_client_version>6.10.36</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3) </message> <stderr_txt> # Using device 0 # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260" # Clock rate: 1.24 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 939196416 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 27 # Number of cores: 216 MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" SWAN : FATAL : Failure executing kernel sync [reduce_kernel4] [702] Assertion failed: 0, file swanlib_nv.cpp, line 121 This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information. </stderr_txt> ]]> 2. Host ID 38345 - Win XP x86, 9600 GT, driver 19562, a little OCed. No problem when crunchig 6.03 tasks. The task errored out after 230s. <core_client_version>6.10.18</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # Using device 0 # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce 9600 GT" # Clock rate: 1.62 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536543232 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 8 # Number of cores: 64 MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" # Time per step (avg over 5000 steps): 45.297 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 226.484 s called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]>
	ID: 16086 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16087 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 \| 16:35:53 UTC - in response to Message 16086.
	It did not error out. It finished successfully! The application seems to be working fine. g Tried to crunch two tasks: 1. Host ID: 31329 - WinXP x64 GTX260 65nm, driver 19713, one of unusable GTX260 cards for GPUGRID. Underclocked according to basic settings by wiki - the card is factory OCed. The task erroed out after 2,972s. Very low CPU load (max. 8% of one core used). <core_client_version>6.10.36</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3) </message> <stderr_txt> # Using device 0 # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260" # Clock rate: 1.24 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 939196416 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 27 # Number of cores: 216 MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" SWAN : FATAL : Failure executing kernel sync [reduce_kernel4] [702] Assertion failed: 0, file swanlib_nv.cpp, line 121 This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information. </stderr_txt> ]]> 2. Host ID 38345 - Win XP x86, 9600 GT, driver 19562, a little OCed. No problem when crunchig 6.03 tasks. The task errored out after 230s. <core_client_version>6.10.18</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # Using device 0 # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce 9600 GT" # Clock rate: 1.62 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536543232 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 8 # Number of cores: 64 MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" # Time per step (avg over 5000 steps): 45.297 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 226.484 s called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]>
	ID: 16087 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

nenym Send message Joined: 31 Mar 09 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,308,230,581 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16088 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 \| 17:15:16 UTC - in response to Message 16087. Last modified: 30 Mar 2010 \| 17:15:48 UTC
	You are right GDF, claimed 18.73, granted 28.09 for 280s elapsed time. Very high credit for 9600 GT, nice. Sorry for my thoughtlessness, wall-clock time 280s is unexpected for succefully finished task.
	ID: 16088 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

MarkJ Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16090 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 \| 20:42:24 UTC - in response to Message 16082.
	Picked up 3 tonight. 2 out of 3 crashed after about 15 seconds. Third is still going. Third one completed successfully. Link is here ____________ BOINC blog
	ID: 16090 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16091 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 \| 21:33:04 UTC - in response to Message 16088.
	For what it's worth, 6h and 3h into 6.22 runs on two seperate systems that use GT240s. Estimated run time 11h and 13h roughly.
	ID: 16091 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

SuperViruS Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 8 Credit: 127,707,074 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16092 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 \| 21:59:53 UTC
	1st beta 6.22 WU completed. ^^ http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=2073498 Approximately 3000 seconds faster on my GTX 275, a performance increase of 16% Good work!! ____________
	ID: 16092 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16094 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 \| 23:05:22 UTC - in response to Message 16092.
	cuda30 version is also out now. This should work on Fermi. gdf
	ID: 16094 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Aardvark Send message Joined: 27 Nov 08 Posts: 28 Credit: 82,362,324 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16096 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 \| 1:20:05 UTC - in response to Message 16094.
	Success. Two completed results taking approximately 19 & 20 minutes each. Windows 7, i7 920, 2X GTX260 (55nm, 216 core). Running 8 cpu tasks simultaneously. 2076209 1307386 31 Mar 2010 0:37:59 UTC 31 Mar 2010 1:09:04 UTC Completed and validated 1,221.97 207.51 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30) 2076073 1307228 31 Mar 2010 0:20:28 UTC 31 Mar 2010 1:07:05 UTC Completed and validated 1,144.30 198.67 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30) Using about 15% of one cpu thread (about 2% of total cpu)per WU. This is the best I've seen yet.
	ID: 16096 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

nenym Send message Joined: 31 Mar 09 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,308,230,581 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16097 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 \| 6:19:38 UTC - in response to Message 16094. Last modified: 31 Mar 2010 \| 6:21:01 UTC
	6.22 cuda 3.0 erroed out (both GTX260 and 9600GT). ID 31329 <core_client_version>6.10.18</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # Using device 0 # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260" # Clock rate: 1.24 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 939196416 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 27 # Number of cores: 216 MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" </stderr_txt> ]]> ID 38345 <core_client_version>6.10.18</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -40 (0xffffffd8) </message> <stderr_txt> # Using device 0 # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce 9600 GT" # Clock rate: 1.62 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536543232 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 8 # Number of cores: 64 SWAN : Module load result [.fastfill.cu.] [200] SWAN: FATAL : Module load failed </stderr_txt> ]]>
	ID: 16097 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

nenym Send message Joined: 31 Mar 09 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,308,230,581 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16098 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 \| 7:00:26 UTC - in response to Message 16097. Last modified: 31 Mar 2010 \| 7:02:03 UTC
	nenym wrote: 6.22 cuda 3.0 erroed out (both GTX260 and 9600GT). 6.22 cuda 3.0 works fine on GTX260 now, wow. The first task finished on my weird GTX260 after updating from 181.xx drivers.
	ID: 16098 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

nenym Send message Joined: 31 Mar 09 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,308,230,581 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16099 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 \| 8:17:14 UTC
	After updating 9600GT drivers to WHQL 197.13 6.22 cuda 3.0 runs fine.
	ID: 16099 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16100 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 \| 12:01:52 UTC
	What's the oldest driver required for the CUDA 3.0 app? MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 16100 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16101 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 \| 12:10:10 UTC - in response to Message 16100.
	It gets shipped only if you have 197.13. gdf
	ID: 16101 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

X-Files 27 Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 95 Credit: 68,023,693 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16106 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 \| 17:59:21 UTC - in response to Message 16101.
	6.22 cuda and cuda3.0 works fine although I'd like to test cuda3.0 on a full blown WU (not the shorties). The 6.22 cuda doesnt seem to give any performance boost on GTX 295 (2003572) ____________
	ID: 16106 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

MarkJ Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16108 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 \| 21:12:01 UTC - in response to Message 16101.
	It gets shipped only if you have 197.13. gdf Cuda toolkit 3 was supported from 195.62 drivers onwards. You could give the cuda 3 DLL's to machines with this or later. ____________ BOINC blog
	ID: 16108 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

cristipurdel Send message Joined: 31 Mar 10 Posts: 45 Credit: 103,429,292 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16114 - Posted: 1 Apr 2010 \| 11:46:34 UTC Last modified: 1 Apr 2010 \| 11:51:16 UTC
	Just finished my 1 WU http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=2082769 Really surprised to see that the system wasn't too lagy when I ran medium graphics software while crunching. So far it seams to be on par with Collatz, thinking of system responsiveness, and much better than SETI or Einstein. Really happy I could put the FX 580 Quadro to work, and doing currently only ACEMD beta :)
	ID: 16114 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Bedrich Hajek Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 485 Credit: 11,091,704,313 RAC: 15,706,590 Level Scientific publications	Message 16123 - Posted: 2 Apr 2010 \| 2:54:14 UTC - in response to Message 16101.
	It gets shipped only if you have 197.13. gdf This is not correct. My computer downloaded 2 of these units and I am running version 195.62. They both crashed after about 2 seconds.
	ID: 16123 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

MarkJ Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16125 - Posted: 2 Apr 2010 \| 7:09:44 UTC - in response to Message 16123.
	It gets shipped only if you have 197.13. gdf This is not correct. My computer downloaded 2 of these units and I am running version 195.62. They both crashed after about 2 seconds. If you read a couple of posts further up I mentioned that according to to nvidia 195.62 supports cuda toolkit 3. Its likely the guys changed it so we get the the cuda 3 DLL's and beta app. It may be that the latest cuda 3 toolkit doesn't work properly with 195.62, but it may with later drivers. I have 196 drivers, but haven't picked up any beta work since the cuda 3 version came out. I will see if I can get one. Its also possible its a bug with the beta app and nothing to do with the driver version. ____________ BOINC blog
	ID: 16125 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

X-Files 27 Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 95 Credit: 68,023,693 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16141 - Posted: 3 Apr 2010 \| 8:56:29 UTC - in response to Message 16125.
	4 success and 2 failed on cuda30 2087571 1314084 2 Apr 2010 9:37:39 UTC 2 Apr 2010 15:34:03 UTC Completed and validated 1,108.61 164.94 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30) 2082414 1310891 1 Apr 2010 6:33:05 UTC 1 Apr 2010 12:37:15 UTC Completed and validated 1,064.81 159.25 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30) 2077883 1308284 31 Mar 2010 7:58:55 UTC 31 Mar 2010 15:16:34 UTC Completed and validated 975.61 148.11 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30) 2076183 1307270 31 Mar 2010 0:05:29 UTC 31 Mar 2010 12:05:04 UTC Completed and validated 2,063.01 161.27 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30) 2089792 1314038 2 Apr 2010 21:26:56 UTC 3 Apr 2010 3:06:14 UTC Error while computing 1.00 0.92 0.01 --- ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30) 2091989 1314836 3 Apr 2010 8:14:39 UTC 3 Apr 2010 8:50:54 UTC Error while computing 1.07 0.84 0.01 --- ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30) ____________
	ID: 16141 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stoneageman Send message Joined: 25 May 09 Posts: 224 Credit: 34,057,374,498 RAC: 227 Level Scientific publications	Message 16142 - Posted: 3 Apr 2010 \| 9:49:32 UTC - in response to Message 16141.
	In the last 2 days I've had 12 failures against 12 successes. All using 197.13 driver.
	ID: 16142 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

MarkJ Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16143 - Posted: 3 Apr 2010 \| 10:52:11 UTC
	Updated drivers on one machine to 197.13 and managed to get one 6.22 beta which promptly crashed. Link to wu is here BOINC 6.10.43, Win7 x64 and drivers 197.13 ____________ BOINC blog
	ID: 16143 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

jjwhalen Send message Joined: 23 Nov 09 Posts: 29 Credit: 17,591,899 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16153 - Posted: 3 Apr 2010 \| 20:40:18 UTC
	WU 1314836 died on my Intel quad/GTS250 after 2.39sec ET. I notice it had already crashed on 3 other hosts. Maybe not quite ready for prime time;) ____________
	ID: 16153 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

MarkJ Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16155 - Posted: 3 Apr 2010 \| 22:42:47 UTC - in response to Message 16143. Last modified: 4 Apr 2010 \| 2:35:35 UTC
	Updated drivers on one machine to 197.13 and managed to get one 6.22 beta which promptly crashed. Link to wu is here BOINC 6.10.43, Win7 x64 and drivers 197.13 Make that 2 crashed straight away. Link to 2nd wu is here Card is a GTX275. ____________ BOINC blog
	ID: 16155 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

MarkJ Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16157 - Posted: 4 Apr 2010 \| 2:33:56 UTC
	Got another one that also died immediately. Different machine this time. Everybody who has received it has bombed out too. Link to wu is here BOINC 6.10.43, Win7 x64, 196.21 drivers, GTX295 card this time. ____________ BOINC blog
	ID: 16157 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16158 - Posted: 4 Apr 2010 \| 8:48:03 UTC - in response to Message 16157. Last modified: 5 Apr 2010 \| 17:19:36 UTC
	I removed the CUDA3 application. Let's see if it's just the problem of CUDA3 not being ready. The CUDA2 application should be working as before. gdf
	ID: 16158 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

X-Files 27 Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 95 Credit: 68,023,693 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16181 - Posted: 5 Apr 2010 \| 23:07:41 UTC
	If all goes well would we see 3 plan classes (cuda,cuda23,cuda30)? maybe 2? or just 1? if more than 1, how would the system select the best plan class for a specific device? Currently in this beta I've only seen 1 plan class at a time. ____________
	ID: 16181 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

X-Files 27 Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 95 Credit: 68,023,693 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16200 - Posted: 8 Apr 2010 \| 13:09:23 UTC
	No errors here, running cuda2. ____________
	ID: 16200 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Snow Crash Send message Joined: 4 Apr 09 Posts: 450 Credit: 539,316,349 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16216 - Posted: 8 Apr 2010 \| 22:40:14 UTC
	Two just completed without error. ____________ Thanks - Steve
	ID: 16216 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

cristipurdel Send message Joined: 31 Mar 10 Posts: 45 Credit: 103,429,292 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16232 - Posted: 10 Apr 2010 \| 7:22:37 UTC
	I think I did 30 WUs with Completed and validated, 7 WUs with Error while computing but most of them were under a few seconds. The beta application runs pretty smooth, only thing is if I restart boinc while it processes an WU, the WU restarts. Apart from that, it's stable.
	ID: 16232 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16233 - Posted: 10 Apr 2010 \| 8:11:35 UTC - in response to Message 16232.
	I think I did 30 WUs with Completed and validated, 7 WUs with Error while computing but most of them were under a few seconds. The beta application runs pretty smooth, only thing is if I restart boinc while it processes an WU, the WU restarts. Apart from that, it's stable. Yes, there is a small mistake in the WU itself. I think that next week we may deploy the beta application as the normal application. gdf
	ID: 16233 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Betting Slip Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16235 - Posted: 10 Apr 2010 \| 8:50:40 UTC - in response to Message 16233.
	I have had 2 and both errored and everyone else who did these units also errored. Unlss you can pinpoint something within these specific WU's I don't think it's ready for release but it's your project. ____________ Radio Caroline, the world's most famous offshore pirate radio station. Great music since April 1964. Support Radio Caroline Team - Radio Caroline
	ID: 16235 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

cristipurdel Send message Joined: 31 Mar 10 Posts: 45 Credit: 103,429,292 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16246 - Posted: 12 Apr 2010 \| 5:31:59 UTC - in response to Message 16233.
	Yes, there is a small mistake in the WU itself. I think that next week we may deploy the beta application as the normal application. gdf Does the ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda) application crunch the same WU as the ACEMD - GPU molecular dynamics v6.03 (cuda) application? That would be a powerful speedup.
	ID: 16246 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ftpd Send message Joined: 6 Jun 08 Posts: 152 Credit: 328,250,382 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16248 - Posted: 12 Apr 2010 \| 7:23:00 UTC
	Received yesterday evening 1 WU (1350013). No errors - time 9 min 43 sec. Boinc 6.10.45 GTX 295 197.13 xp-pro Very small WU???? ____________ Ton (ftpd) Netherlands
	ID: 16248 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

X-Files 27 Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 95 Credit: 68,023,693 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16293 - Posted: 13 Apr 2010 \| 22:06:07 UTC
	Today's test was a success (5 WU) without a hitch. ____________
	ID: 16293 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16295 - Posted: 14 Apr 2010 \| 9:39:10 UTC - in response to Message 16248.
	Received yesterday evening 1 WU (1350013). No errors - time 9 min 43 sec. Boinc 6.10.45 GTX 295 197.13 xp-pro Very small WU???? Yes, they are small, just for testing. gdf
	ID: 16295 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

MarkJ Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16297 - Posted: 14 Apr 2010 \| 11:23:16 UTC Last modified: 14 Apr 2010 \| 12:50:15 UTC
	Did 4 today. 2 failed. Everybody else who got the 1st failure wu also crashed. Link to 1st wu here Mine ran on a GTX295, Win7 x64, 196.21 drivers. ____________ BOINC blog
	ID: 16297 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

pwolfe Send message Joined: 24 Mar 09 Posts: 54 Credit: 16,186,927 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 16318 - Posted: 16 Apr 2010 \| 3:02:13 UTC - in response to Message 16297.
	Would love to be able to test my fermi cards on linux. nudge nudge. I just recieve the message no work available.
	ID: 16318 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : New beta 6.22 for Windows (Fermi too)

	About	Science	Volunteers	Performance	Forum	Join us	Donate